The New Music Festival, tagged A Festival of Sonic Collagism and the Art of Sampled and Repurposed Sounds + Images, hosted a panel discussion yesterday about copyright, intellectual property rights and art. Featuring Peter Hatch - composer and organizer of the Open Ears Festival of Music and Sound (
openears.ca), Doug Horne - founding member and host of Frequent Mutilations radio art show on CKHS FM in Waterloo, Mark Hosler - sound artist with Negativland (
negativland.com), Martha Rans - copyright lawyer working with Artists' Legal Outreach in Vancouver (
allianceforarts.com/artists-legal-outreach), and Vancovuer artist DJ Tapes aka Aja Rose Bond. The panel discussed various topics including but not limited to the differences between fair use/dealing, copyright, copyleft, and the differences between perceptions and laws in the US and Canada. The reader may recall that in 2008 Bill C-61, which proposed major changes to Canada's copyright act, was tabled by the Conservative and died when Parliament was dissolved in September 08 (
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_C-61). Peter Hatch situated copyright in history by pointing out that since the 9th century musical tradition has including the use of other artists work in the creative process. According to him, and generally accepted by the room, it wasn't until the 19th century and the commodification of culture that copyright became a legal and economic issue. The audience was interested to know what the panel thought about the ethics of copyright, but Hark Hosler pointed out that "good or bad doesn't matter because [appropriation of work is] happening". The group debated the line that defines infringement and appropriation, and the ethical and legal elements of the topic, but the most poignant comment in my opinion was from DJ Tapes who asserted that for her, the only economic issue is one of subsistence of the artist, and whether or not they have the tools and time to continue to create, while the only ethical issue is one of exploitation, as when an artist's vision is rendered moot by the use of their material by out of context. An engaging discussion to say the least!